HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-07-07 - Regular City Council12'7
REGULAR SESSION - TUESDAY
JULY 7, 1981 - 7:00 P.M.
CHAMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY HALL, STEPHENVILLE, TEXAS
The City Council of the City of Stephenville, Texas, met in
regular session Tuesday, July 7, 1981 at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Pro
Tem W. M. Irwin present and presiding.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
G. A. Swindle
William G. Brede
Larry Hammett
David Clayton
OTHERS ATTENDING:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Joe F. Cummings, Mayor
Charles Riggins
Raymond Anderson
E. W. Ferguson
City Administrator Kurt Ackermann
City Secretary Joyce Pemberton
City Attorney Joseph Chandler
Director of Public Works R. Y. Gann
Fire Marshall Kenneth Haley
Mrs. Virginia Dorris
Dr. Robert Fain
Mr. Jim Bachus
Mrs. K. F. Lavender
Members of the press and many others.
Mayor Pro Tem Irwin called the meeting to order and declared a
quorum present.
ITEM I: APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Councilman Swindle moved, seconded by Councilman Clayton, that
the minutes of the City Council meetings of June 2nd and June 16th,
1981, be approved as written. Motion carried unanimously by those
members present.
ITEM II: MRS. K. F. LAVENDER SPEAKS REGARDING DAY-CARE CENTERS.
Mrs. K. F. Lavender, operator of Happy Days Child Care Center,
588 Harbin Drive, addressed the Council regarding the zoning districts
for day-care centers.
Mrs. Lavender advised the Council that the reason she and other
operators of child care facilities were present at this meeting was
to voice to,.the;Cauncil their concern regarding a committee report
to the Board of Adjustment June 25, 1981, regarding day-care centers
and the zoning of day-care centers.
Mrs. Lavender said that in July, 1980, she had moved her day-care
center from Tarleton St. to 588 Harbin Dr. At that time, she had been
advised by the Building Inspector that, because day-care centers were
not classified in the zoning ordinance, she would need to meet with
the Board of Adjustment for classification or a Special Use Permit.
In August, 1980, the Board of Adjustment granted her a one (1) year
Special Use Permit to operate a day-care center at 588 Harbin Drive.
At this same meeting, Chairman Fain appointed a two -member committee
to do a study as to the classification of day-care centers and report
back to the Board of Adjustment. Mrs. Lavender said her lease expires
July, 1981 and the Special Use Permit expires August, 1981, and she
needs to know what area she can locate a permanent day-care center.
Mrs. Lavender advised thaty;) in the June 25th Board of Adjustment
meeting, the Committee had recommended that a registered day-care home,
keeping 6 children or less, be permitted in R-1 and R-2 zoned districts.
A licensed group day-care home, keeping 7 to 12 children, or a
licensed day-care center, keeping 12 or more children, be located
in the proposed R-3 or B-1 zoned districts. She said she did not
believe enough time and study had gone into the Committee's report
and recommendations as far as where the zones are located and the
welfare of the children are concerned. Mrs. Lavender said that
the final outcome will be "babysitters" keeping 6 or less children
and the large corporate day-care centers because the large cor-
porations will be the only ones financially able to locate in
B-1 districts. She said that the "grandfather" clause will, in a
period of years, eliminate all group day-care facilities because
if they move from their present location or quit for awhile they
would not be permitted to reopen their facility. She advised that
there is a need for all 3 types of child care facilities,and parents
should have the opportunity to choose the type day-care service
they want. There is a need for the children to remain in the
residential areas.
In closing her presentation, Mrs. Lavender asked the Council
the following questions:
1. Will churches located in R-1 and R-2 zoned districts be
permitted to 'operate dby-care centers?
2. Is her operation the only one being banned from the resit
dential areas?
3. What is the problem?
4. Why does the Committee feel that the children are a problem?
5. Why are the children being banned from the residential neigh-
borhoods?
Mayor Pro Tem Irwin advised that the Board of Adjustment has and
is working on this and have not reached a decision as of this date.
Dr. Robert Fain advised the Council that the Board of Adjustment
received the committee's report on June 25th and has not had an
opportunity to study or discuss said rep,omtnendations. He said he
would call a meeting wsthin...the next week and try to reach a decision
at that time.
Mrs. Virginia Dorris advised, the Council that when she and Mrs.
Martin presented their preliminary report to the Board of Adjustment
no action was taken. The Board had not had an opportunity to even
discuss the report and recommendations.
Mayor Pro Tem Irwin advised that no action will be taken until
the Board of Adjustment has reached a decision and made a report.
III: HEAR JIM BACHUS, CHIEF APPRAISER, CENTRAL APP
Mr. Jim Bachus, Chief Appraiser, Central Appraisal District,
addressed the Council regarding the proposed new official city map.
He said this map has been in the working for about 3 years. He said
the State requires, beginning in 1982, an official map with each lot
located and numbered. He said the Appraisal District would like to
help to get the map ready for use. Mr. Bachus advised that the
Central Appraisal District would pay approximately $4850.00 toward
the reproduction costs provided:
1. The City keep the map updated with any changes maple.
2. The Planning & Zoning Commission approve any replats
3. The Central Appraisal District receive 3 18" x 24" copies
and 8 82" x 11" copies at no cost.
4. When changes are made, upkeep pages will be at no cost to
the Appraisal District, tax offices and County Clerk.
5. All upkeep pages will be furnished to original owners at cost.
129
City Administrator Ackermann advised that the City has an in-
vestment of $16,000 - $17,000 now with an additional estimated cost
of $10,000 for reproduction costs for 75 copies of 400 pages each.
Mr. Bachus commented that any person interested in the location
and transfer of property will be interested in the new map and that
the City would have the full right to sell or dispose of the other
copies as they saw fit (except those copies he had requested).
Mayor Pro Tem Irwin commented that it looked as if the City would
be furnishing about $22,000. worth of maps, part of which would be
repaid faith monies the City put into the Appraisal District and looks
like the City is coming out on the short end of the stick. He said
that before the City takes any action on this proposal, it should be
put into committee for study. Mayor Pro Tem Irwin appointed Council-
men Clayton, chairman, Brede and Hammett as a committee to study the
proposal presented by Mr. Bachus.
Mr. Bachus also advised the Council that the Appraisal District
had the facilities to provide all the taxing entities with the data
processing services for October, 1982, (tax statements and assorted
information printouts) if said entity so desired,at a cost of Approx-
imately $1400.00 (5000 accts @ 26fi ea.)
Mayor Pro Tem Irwin advised that the above appointed committee
would also take this proposal under consideration and would probably
contact Mr. Bachus to meet with them.
ITEM IV: HEAR SECOND READING OF GULF STATES TELEPHONE FRANCHISE.
After Mayor Pro Tem Irwin's reading of the heading of the Gulf
States telephone franchise, Councilman Swindle moved, seconded by
Councilman Clayton, that the City Council approve the second reading
of Gulf States telephone franchise as read. Motion carried unanimously
by those members present.
ITEM V: CONSIDER RESOLUTION MAKINGA JOINT APPL
Mayor Pro Tem Irwin read the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF STEPHENVILLE TO MAKE A
JOINT APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT FOR WATER RIGHTS ON THE PALUXY
RIVER.
WHEREAS, it is the duty of the City of Stephenville to plan and
provide for the future needs of this community, and;
WHEREAS, it is evident that the groundwater supplies are being
depleteddand will not meet the future water needs of Stephenville;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF STEPHENVILLE, TEXAS, THAT:
The City of Stephenville shall make a joint application for a
permit for water rights on the Paluxy River in conjunction with
Somervell County, Hood County and the City of Granbury, and that
the City of Stephenville does intend to be a party to any water supply
project which may be authorized by said permit.
Also the City of Stephenville authorizes Mr. Conrad Callicoatte
of Graham Associates, Inc. to be its designated representative for
this application and to act in the City's behalf.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 7th day of July, 1981.
s/Joe F. Cummings, Mayor
ATTEST:
s/Joyce Pemberton
After some discussion, Councilman Brede moved, seconded by
Councilman Hammett, that the City Council pass and approve the
above Resolution as read. Motion carried unanimously by those
members present.
There being no other business to come before the Council,
the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
ayor 11ro Tem W. M, 7rwin
ATTEST:
;t2y6 ecretary